POLITICAL ACTIVISM OF THE COORDINATION BODY FOR THE ACCELERATION OF THE FORMATION OF CIBALIUNG REGENCY (BAKOR P2KC) IN ADVOCATING FOR REGIONAL EXPANSION IN PANDEGLANG REGENCY

Authors

  • Shakila Humaira
  • Mahpudin Mahpudin University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Bunga Natasya
  • Ariestawidya Kinasih Azzahra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56945/jkpd.v9i2.363

Keywords:

Regional Expansion, Local Autonomy, Territorial Coalition, Political Dynamics

Abstract

Territorial expansion is a significant phenomenon in Indonesia's administrative and political context, often emerging as a response to the public's need for better public services and more efficient resource management. This study describes the processes and challenges in the effort to establish Cibaliung Regency as a concrete example of local autonomy aspirations. Through an analysis of territorial coalitions and political dynamics, this research highlights the role of political actors, such as local community organizations and regional governments, in forming alliances to achieve territorial expansion goals. The desire of the Cibaliung community to become an autonomous region is driven by several factors, including challenges in accessing public services and perceptions of unequal development. The region's significant economic and tourism potential also serves as a major incentive for territorial expansion. However, the expansion process faces significant obstacles, including the national moratorium that has halted most expansion proposals in Indonesia, as well as bureaucratic challenges and complex political competition. This study identifies that while territorial expansion promises substantial benefits for more effective local governance, this approach also poses risks to the economic stability of the parent region and social integration in the newly formed area. The social, economic, and legal implications of territorial expansion must be carefully managed to minimize negative impacts and maximize positive benefits for all stakeholders involved

References

Adyawarman. (2021). The Challenges of Public Innovation : Insights From Risk Governance in Batang Regency. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 25(1), 1–24. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/62314/31602

Agustino, L. (2010). Dinasti Politik Pasca-Otonomi Orde Baru: Pengalaman Banten. Prisma, 29, 102–116.

Agustino, L., & Yusoff, M. A. (2008). Proliferasi dan etno-nasionalisme daripada pemberdayaan dalam pemekaran daerah di Indonesia. Bisnis & Briokrasi, 15(3), 196–201.

Antlöv, H., & Wetterberg, A. (2014). Village Governance , Community Life , and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. 1–40.

Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, A., D. (2007). Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices. Brookings Institution Press, Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt1261v1

Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1983). Decentralization and development: policy implementation in developing countries. In Decentralization and development: policy implementation in developing countries. (Issue 581).

Creswell. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset (3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Eilenberg, M. (2009). Negotiating autonomy at the margins of the state the dynamics of elite politics in the borderland of West Kalimantan, Indonesia.

South East Asia Research, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009788745831

Hidayat, R. (2015). Otonomi Daerah dan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia. Pustaka Demokrasi.

Hidayati, F. (2017). Can decentralization affect public service delivery? A preliminary study of local government’s innovation and responsiveness in Indonesia. Firda Hidayati/ JPAS, 1(3), 80–86.

Kimura, E. (2010). Proliferating provinces: Territorial politics in post-Suharto Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 18(3), 415–449. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2010.0005

Kuncoro, M. (2012). Ekonomi Pembangunan: Teori dan Aplikasi. UPP STIM YKPN.

Mahpudin, M., Indriyany, I. A., & Hikmawan, M. D. (2021). Between Elites and Society: The Politics of Territorial Splits in a Decentralizing Era, Case of

Lebak District, Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v6i1.11019

Pratiwi Sofia, A., & Sutanto, H. (2023). Dampak Pemekaran Desa Pada Kehidupan Sosial Dan Ekonomi Di Desa Sama Guna, Kecamatan Tanjung. Journal of Economics and Business, 9(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.29303/ekonobis.v9i1.127

Ramdhani, H., Politik, D. I., Indonesia, U., Cirebon, K., Indramayu, K., Daerah, P., & Ekonomi, S. D. (n.d.). DINAMIKA ELITE POLITIK LOKAL MENGENAI ISU. 3, 182–203.

Rohmah, N. S., & Rohmah, N. S. (2018). Elit Dan Pemekaran Daerah; Konflik Antar Elit Dalam Proses Pembentukan Provinsi Banten. CosmoGov, 4(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v4i2.16133

Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization The Territorial Dimension of the State. Allen & Unwin.

Suryanto, S. (2013). Pemekaran Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Desentralisasi, 11(1), 359–370. https://doi.org /10.37378/jd.2013.1.359-370

Published

02-12-2025

How to Cite

POLITICAL ACTIVISM OF THE COORDINATION BODY FOR THE ACCELERATION OF THE FORMATION OF CIBALIUNG REGENCY (BAKOR P2KC) IN ADVOCATING FOR REGIONAL EXPANSION IN PANDEGLANG REGENCY. (2025). JKPD Banten - Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Banten, 9(2), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.56945/jkpd.v9i2.363